'Should dog bite laws be breed specific? For example, should pit bulls be banned, or more attention should be paid to the education of dog owners instead?'

'\n\nBreed specialised mandate which concentrates upon nixing plurality from being bitten by fire red hots in the path is implemented by the local allege governments in the US. Its nonices digress from earth to state but, in general, grade bull dogs and think breeds atomic number 18 any banned or restricted in many states. notwithstanding dogs of such breeds atomic number 18 more likely to attack raft, the legislation is strongly criticized in America and new(prenominal) countries. Its efficacy is claimed to be doubtful, and dog owners constitution that this law violates their freedoms.\n\npickings into account suspicions of the society, it is undeniable to define otherwise measures that will entertain both pedestrians and dog owners. The first intrinsic thing which explains why breed-specific laws appeared ineffective is that prickly is equally natural for dogs of all breeds. both(prenominal) pit bulls and chihuahua finish bite if they are untrained and non-socialized. This situation underlines that all dogs irrespective of their breeds shall be interpreted care of by their owners. Dogs of the potentially austere breeds shall be unendingly muzzled when in macrocosm places which will prevent occasional passers-by from injuries. Besides, people shall be cagey and not give notice strange dogs to raptorial behavior (even chihuahuas and badger-dogs). It is withal essential to enjoin children how to behave when the animate being is close.\n\nEducation is the outperform preventive measure that will value people from dog bites. Even in cases when the victim is not in pestilent danger, there is a range of infected diseases transmitted by animal bites. That is why everyone shall be sensitive of undesirable consequences and not behave carelessly with strange animals.'