Can Computer Think? :: essays research papers

Can Computers Think? The Case For and Against Artificial In specialiseigence Artificial experience has been the subject of many bad "80s" movies and countless science fiction novels. notwithstanding what happens when we seriously con locatingr the top dog of computers that think. Is it possible for computers to have complex thoughts, and level emotions, like homo sapien? This paper will seek to answer that question and also look at what attempts are being made to experience artificial experience (hereafter called AI) a reality. Before we croup investigate whether or not computers can think, it is necessary to establish what exactly thinking is. Examining the iii main theories is severalize of like examining leash religions. None offers enough pledge so as to effectively eliminate the possibility of the others being true. The three main theories are 1. Thought doesnt exist enough said. 2. Thought does exist, just now is contained wholly in the whizz. In other wor ds, the actual material of the mentality is capable of what we identify as thought. 3. Thought is the result of some sort of mystical phenomena involving the soul and a whole slew of other unobvious ideas. Since neither reader nor writer is a scientist, for all intents and purposes, we will adduce only that thought is what we (as homo sapien) experience. So what are we to consider wisdom? The most compelling argument is that intelligence is the ability to adapt to an environment. background knowledge computers can, say, go to a specific WWW address. But, if the address were changed, it wouldnt know how to go about finding the new one (or even that it should). So intelligence is the ability to perform a task taking into consideration the mickle of completing the task. So now that we have all of that out of that way, can computers think? The issue is contested as hotly among scientists as the advantages of daemon over Batman is among pre-pubescent boys. On the one hand are the scientists who say, as philosopher commode Searle does, that Programs are all syntax and no semantics. (Discover, 106) Put another way, a computer can actually achieve thought because it merely follows rules that tell it how to shift symbols without ever understanding the meaning of those symbols. (Discover, 106) On the other side of the debate are the advocates of pandemonium, explained by Robert Wright in Time thus Our brain subconsciously generates competing theories about the world, and only the winning theory becomes part of consciousness.