English A Language And Literature Essay

These notes to examiners atomic number 18 intended only as guidelines to assist marking. They are not spelled as an exhaustive and fixed set of responses or approaches to which either answers must rigidly adhere. Good ideas or angles not beared here should be acknowledged and rewarded as stamp down.Similarly, answers which do not include all the ideas or approaches suggested here should be rewarded appropriately.SECTION ACandidates are required to study a garner from John Steinbeck to his eldest son Thom with an advice comic sack by Ken Cursoe, some(prenominal) of which explore the virtues (or not) of being in love. An suitable to good abbreviation will note the commonalities of the 2 text editions, such as Thom and Luke both seeking advice close love, the experts opinion about love, male/female distinctions, etc note some of the differences between the two texts, such as father / Tiny Sepuku, sincerity / humor, letter / advice column/ sketch, etc remark on the diff erent text types, noting some characteristics of each(prenominal). (For example, the letter observes the conventions of the form and responds to a letter on a individualised level and addresses the issues it raises in a clear and logical hammer. The cartoon, posing as an advice column, opens with a brief letter of two questions answered by Tiny in a tongue-in-cheek fashion through seven vignettes of the super powers that love gives to either the male or female in the relationship) mark on the differences of context as deduced from the multiplication and situations in which the texts were generated and from issues and references made within the texts themselves, such as the vignettes of the cartoon, the implications of the gestures and language of the cartoon characters, as well as the relationships revealed in the letter and the attitudes expressed by Steinbeck comment on the differences of listening and purpose as deduced from the two text types. A good to excellent analysis m ay also rate further the differences in the attitudes to love consider more closely the purposes of the writers as prognosised through their choice of text types, considering closely the differences between seriousness and pique offer a more in-depth analysis of both the letter and the cartoon, lookingclosely at the stylistic features and showing some familiarity with terms appropriate to each offer a more careful consideration of audience and purpose, for example, the original recipient of the letter and, now, the wider audience interested in the living and writings of John Steinbeck, and, for the cartoon, those who follow the comic strip (and write in) or the general public who are amused by the cartoonists intervention of the subject.4N13/1/AYENG/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX/MSECTION BCandidates are required to compare the poem Eyepiece by Judith Beveridge with a subject from the Yahoo forum Microscope Microscopy as a hobby or profession, which present, respectively, figurative and typo views of the world seen through a microscope. An adequate to good analysis will note the commonalities of the two texts the viewing of the world through a microscope, the identification of what is being looked at in each case comment on the two text types exploring some characteristics of each (the blend of personal and scientific comments in the message, as well as the nature of observation, both general and specific, the use of scientific language, the global nature of the group, etc as impertinent to the more refined qualities of the poem stanzas, lines, enjambment, simile, extended metaphor, alliteration, etc) comment on the view of the world that is offered by these writers and how distinctions between their purposes, contexts and audience shape their use of language, agency and technique offer a recognition of the distinction between literal and figurative. A good to excellent analysis may also offer a more in-depth analysis of both text types, showing how choice of t ext type influences both the structure and style of the essence offer a careful consideration of the world view that is presented in each text looking at the distinctions between describing an evening as though itwere a vision seen through a microscope compared with the reality of looking at water through a microscope and the impact (such as fascinating, ball over and horrified) on the observer consider more closely the two speaking voices (the scientist and the persona of the poem), how they are characterized and to what effect offer a grave comparison of the two text types that offers a clear understanding of purpose, context, content and audience.